MIST

Magnetosphere, Ionosphere and Solar-Terrestrial

Latest articles

Latest news

Call for applications for STFC Public Engagement Early-Career Researcher Forum

 

The STFC Public Engagement Early-Career Researcher Forum (the ‘PEER Forum’) will support talented scientists and engineers in the early stages of their career to develop their public engagement and outreach goals, to ensure the next generation of STFC scientists and engineers continue to deliver the highest quality of purposeful, audience-driven public engagement.

Applications are being taken until 4pm on 3 June 2021. If you would like to apply, visit the PEER Forum website, and if you have queries This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

The PEER Forum aims:

  • To foster peer learning and support between early career scientists and engineers with similar passion for public engagement and outreach, thus developing a peer support network that goes beyond an individual’s term in the forum 
  • To foster a better knowledge and understanding of the support mechanisms available from STFC and other organisations, including funding mechanisms, evaluation, and reporting. As well as how to successfully access and utilise this support 
  • To explore the realities of delivering and leading public engagement as an early career professional and build an evidence base to inform and influence STFC and by extension UKRI’s approaches to public engagement, giving an effective voice to early career researchers

What will participation in the Forum involve?

Participants in the PEER Forum will meet face-to-face at least twice per year to share learning and to participate in session that will strengthen the depth and breadth of their understanding of public engagement and outreach.

Who can apply to join the Forum?

The PEER Forum is for practising early-career scientists and engineers who have passion and ambition for carrying out excellent public engagement alongside, and complementary to, their career in science or engineering. We are seeking Forum members from across the breadth of STFC’s pure and applied science and technology remit.

The specific personal requirements of PEER Forum membership are that members:

  • Have completed (or currently studying for – including apprentices and PhD students) their highest level of academic qualification within the last ten years (not including any career breaks)
  • Are employed at a Higher Education Institute, or a research-intensive Public Sector Research Organisation or Research Laboratory (including STFC’s own national laboratories)
  • Work within a science and technology field in STFC’s remit, or with a strong inter-disciplinary connection to STFC’s remit, or use an STFC facility to enable their own research
  • Clearly describe their track record of experience in their field, corresponding to the length of their career to date
  • Clearly describe their track record of delivering and leading, or seeking the opportunity to lead, public engagement and/or outreach
  • Can provide insight into their experiences in public engagement and/or outreach and also evidence one or more of
  • Inspiring others
  • Delivering impact
  • Demonstrating creativity
  • Introducing transformative ideas and/or inventions
  • Building and sustaining collaborations/networks
  • Are keen communicators with a willingness to contribute to the success of a UK-wide network

    • https://stfc.ukri.org/public-engagement/training-and-support/peer-forum/  

    Astronet Science Vision & Infrastructure Roadmap

     

    Astronet is a consortium of European funding agencies, established for the purpose of providing advice on long-term planning and development of European Astronomy. Setup in 2005, its members include most of the major European astronomy nations, with associated links to the European Space Agency, the European Southern Observatory, SKA, and the European Astronomical Society, among others. The purpose of the Science Vision and Infrastructure Roadmap is to deliver a coordinated vision covering the entire breadth of astronomical research, from the origin and early development of the Universe to our own solar system.

    The first European Science Vision and Infrastructure Roadmap for Astronomy was created by Astronet, using EU funds, in 2008/09, and updated in 2014/15. Astronet is now developing a new Science Vision & Infrastructure Roadmap, in a single document with an outlook for the next 20 years. A delivery date to European funding agencies of mid-2021 is anticipated. 

    The Science Vision and Infrastructure Roadmap revolves around the research themes listed below:

    • Origin and evolution of the Universe
    • Formation and evolution of galaxies
    • Formation & evolution of stars
    • Formation & evolution of planetary systems
    • Understanding the solar system and conditions for life

    but will include cross-cutting aspects such as computing and training and sustainability.

     

    After some delays due to the global pandemic, the first drafts of the chapters for the document are now available from the Panels asked to draft them, for you to view and comment on. For the Science Vision & Roadmap to be truly representative it is essential we take account of the views of as much of the European astronomy and space science community as possible – so your input is really valued by the Panels and Astronet. Please leave any comments, feedback or questions on the site by 1 May 2021.

    It is intended that a virtual “town hall” style event will be held in late Spring 2021, where an update on the project and responses to the feedback will be provided.

    Equitable Letters in Space Physics (ELSP)

    Equitable Letters for Space Physics (ELSP) is a project to encourage merit-based recommendations and nominations in the space physics community by providing resources for letter writing and reviews of recommendation and nomination letters. You can learn more about ELSP's mission and find both letter writing and implicit bias resources at the ELSP website.

    ELSP seeks to achieve this goal by:

    1. Providing resources for people writing letters of recommendation and award nomination at the undergraduate level and above.
    2. Providing resources for people wishing to learn about different implicit biases and lessen their manifestation.
    3. Providing reviews of recommendation and nomination letters, with the goal of lessening implicit bias in these letters.

    At the moment, ELSP is seeking volunteers to participate as reviewers in the letter submission system. This system will function similarly to double-blind journal article reviews, with the ELSP executive director acting as editor.The ELSP board of directors is Angeline G. Burrell; John Coxon; Alexa Halford; McArthur Jones Jr.; and Kate Zawdie. If you have more questions or would like to participate, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

    Call for proposals for ESA's Living Planet Fellowship

    ESA is currently inviting proposals for their Living Planet Fellowship with a deadline of 15 March 2021. These fellowships, worth a maximum of €110k, are intended:

    To support young scientists, at post-doctoral level, to undertake cutting-edge research in Earth Observation, Earth System Science or Climate Research, maximising the scientific return of ESA and European EO missions and datasets through the development of novel EO methods, techniques and products, and by delivering excellent scientific results addressing the grand Earth Science challenges of the next decade, enabling improved predictions of the physical interaction of society with the Earth system.

    Interested candidates need to propose a two-year-long research plan which contributes to either of the two themes of the fellowship: "Advancing novel methods and techniques" or "Advancing Earth system science". The call also includes opportunities in the use of cloud computing capabilities; to support small ground-based experiments and in situ data collection; and a visiting scientist scheme to join the new ESA Earth System Science Hub.

    Questions related to the call can be submitted via email, and must be "not later than two weeks before the Closing Date" (i.e. by the end of February 2021). The timeline for the fellowships is as follows:

    Milestone Date
    Submission of proposals 15 March 2021 
    Communication of results* Q2 2021
    Beginning of activities* Q3 2021

    *tentative

    "Mental Health and Wellbeing in the MIST Community": A series of panel discussions

    We are hosting a series of pre-recorded panel discussions on the topic of "Mental Health and Wellbeing in the MIST Community", exploring the sources and impacts within our community as well as discussing ways to move forwards. The discussions will focus on both individual and community-wide perspectives, and will consider perspectives from a range of career stages. The panel discussions will separately focus on views from a) PhD students, b) PDRAs, and c) Tenure positions. 
     
    To ensure that the discussion focuses on the needs and issues most important to the MIST Community, we request your input on questions that you would like to pose to the panel, as well as specific topics that you would like to see covered. To suggest questions & topics, please use the following form: https://forms.gle/J4QS5JdaVCo1hF6z7 and submit your suggestions by Friday 26 February. Please note that any responses on the form are completely anonymous.
     
    For support with mental health and wellbeing concerns, we recommend the following resources: https://ras.ac.uk/education-and-careers/places-you-can-find-support.
     
    If you have any other questions, concerns, or would like to discuss anything in further detail, please get in touch at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

    My experience of attending the Geospace Environment Modelling (GEM) 2018 workshop

    by Harneet Sangha

    Harneet Sangha is a second year PhD student at the University of Leicester. Harneet researches the structure and variability of field aligned current systems in Earth’s magnetosphere. In this blog post, Harneet talks about attending the 2018 GEM (Geospace Environment Modelling) workshop in Sante Fe.

    What is GEM?

    The GEM workshop showcases current research in investigating the Earth’s magnetosphere and how it is coupled to the ionosphere, atmosphere and the solar wind. There are a handful of research areas (Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interactions, the Inner Magnetosphere, Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, Global System Modelling, and the Magnetotail and Plasmasheet), all of which have a number of their own smaller focus groups during the workshop. These focus groups change every few years, and new focus groups can be proposed by the community. GEM is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and is a subsection of the NSF Geosciences Division.

    I attended the GEM 2018 workshop, which ran from 17 June - 23 June 2018. I actually ended up going to America a few days early, and stayed in America for an extra week afterwards for a little holiday.

    How did I fund the trip? 

    I received funding from GEM, specifically the NSF, which paid for the accommodation and all internal travel to and from the conference. To receive this funding I applied to GEM directly, and had to send a statement of purpose to explain my research goals, how GEM will help me to pursue these goals, and how I can contribute to GEM (I contributed by presenting my work both orally and with a poster. I also signed up to do a student tutorial and although I didn’t get chosen for the tutorials, I was placed in reserve). GEM required me to write a follow-up report, explaining the benefits of attending, and what I gained from the whole experience. In addition to the GEM grant, I received money from the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS), which funded the flights to America, as well as food costs. I also had to provide a follow up report of the experience for RAS too.

    The more things (a talk, poster, tutorials etc.) you sign up for, the more likely you are to receive funding from GEM. So apply for anything you can! You may not get everything, but the fact that you have signed up for them means you can be a reserve in case other students are unable to actually do them in the end (e.g. the student day tutorials). Also, if you do get to do everything, the experiences will be great!

    A day in Sante Fe

    The whole workshop was based in the Eldorado Hotel that the majority of us were staying in, which was really convenient! All the different focus group sessions were in different conference rooms along the same corridor, making it quick and easy to jump between the sessions, and find one that you were interested in.

    The beautiful view from the rooftop of the Eldorado Hotel, where the GEM icebreaker event was held.

    In the mornings, the sessions started at 08:30 and typically ran until 17:00, interspersed with coffee breaks and a lunch break. The talks were 10 minutes long with a couple of minutes for questions. On Tuesday and Thursday, there were poster sessions, which took place between 17:00 - 21:00. 

    I went to a lot of sessions throughout the whole week and would always try to pick the ones that were most relevant to me. If there wasn’t one at a specific time I would either go to an interesting, semi-unrelated session, or go exploring the area around the hotel. I made notes on all the talks, and anything that may have helped my understanding for my own work. I also brought back a list of papers that I wanted to read, either out of interest or to further my knowledge. I saw a lot of interesting talks, especially as there was some work that I had no idea about, so it was very fascinating to see. The most useful session that I went to (and also presented in) was the Inner Magnetosphere Cross-Energy/Population Interactions sessions, these talks ranged from modelling the behaviour of energetic particles in the inner magnetosphere, to studying chorus wave activity during storms. I also found sitting in on the panel discussions were very interesting, these would take place in the last session (usually of 3) of the focus groups, and the focus group leaders would discuss (along with the audience) the topics within the research area that need to be explored further. For example, the relationship between the ionosphere-atmosphere system during storm time is currently not well-known, neither are interhemispheric asymmetries in a lot of areas, including field-aligned currents and sub-auroral polarization streams (both related to my work).

    The workshop was very sociable! At lunchtimes we would head to local restaurants in groups to eat out. I always tried to go to different places to try all the local cuisine, and it was easily done. There are more than enough different places to eat for the whole week. In the evenings, we would all go out to get some dinner, have some drinks, and socialise. On the Wednesday we had the conference dinner, which was held in the hotel. 

    My first international conference!

    This was my first international conference, as well as my first poster presentation. Before I even got there I had learned what made a good poster, and created one that I thought would have a chance of winning the student poster competition that I would be entering. By actually taking part in the poster competition, the anonymous judges provided me with some really useful suggestions to improve my future poster presentations, so I did learn a lot from the experience. Also, from presenting my work both orally and in a poster, I got a huge amount of good feedback, including a lot of different directions I can go in with my future projects. I brought these ideas back and we now have a long list of possible avenues for my research to go down. Both my poster and my presentation had the same title of “Field-Aligned Current Structure of Sub-Auroral Polarization Streams”, and I had given them both the same theme. This meant that those who had seen my presentation on the Tuesday morning, would be more likely to remember my work that Tuesday evening during the poster session, and could come up to me to discuss my work.

    A photo from my oral presentation on the Tuesday morning.

    GEM was a great opportunity for me to meet lots of international PhD students and researchers within the same field as me. Due to the layout of the GEM programme, the first full day (Sunday) was filled with student tutorials, where the PhD students would present some basic theory on different topics. This meant that we all had the same basic understanding as each other before the workshop began the next day. On this day, there were only students present, which meant that we got to know who all the students were straight away and got to chat with them before the main programme started. This happens every year and it’s a great way to meet everyone. We had an icebreaker during one of the breaks, which also really helped with introductions.

    The conference was in Santa Fe, New Mexico. The area around the hotel was really lovely, a lot of mountains in the distances. It was really hot there too! The food was really great, and the shops were filled with beautiful handmade ornaments and jewellery, as well as a lot of pretty stones and gems in a few of the shops. I really enjoyed looking around all the shops! There is also the Georgia O’Keefe Museum nearby to the hotel which a few of us went to look around one day during a break.

    One of the shop displays showing the vibrant items for sale.

    Would I go to GEM again?

    I would highly recommend attending this workshop. I found it had a really nice atmosphere which was friendly and more on the informal side (like MIST). It was a lot larger than MIST conferences that I have attended, but it was nice to get to meet so many new people at once and present my work to a large international audience for the first time.

    I would definitely go again! I made a lot of good friends from this trip, who I have still kept in contact with and will hopefully see at other conferences in the future (even if I don’t return to GEM).

    By talking to researchers throughout the week and talking about my work, I have new ideas and directions to go with my work. I have also promoted my work and my name. A lot of people who were interested in my work have said they will look out for my future papers, and a few have sent me emails with potentially relevant papers which has been really helpful for my work. And I am also about to email a few more people who I had met there to help me with my work!

     

    If you have any more questions about Harneet’s experience at GEM then you can This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

    Some useful links:

    Click here for information about the 2019 workshop.

    Details on past/future GEM workshops are available here. This page also includes information on subscribing to the email newsletters. To join the student mailing list, you can This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to be added to the GEM Students mailing list.